For example, sunbathing/relaxing is a calming activity and, as it typically involves little movement, there would be less trampling, fewer depreciative rock pooling behaviours and less overall disturbance to the wildlife. As shown in Fig. 2, some activities (including walking and rock pooling) were beneficial to the visitor but have the potential to be rather harmful to the environment. In psychological

terms, these activities allow exploration of this environment, show fascination towards the landscape and wildlife, and may involve learning by finding certain species, or include exercise along a scenic environment (Kaplan, 1995). Environmentally, as these activities are exploratory they may involve walking over vulnerable areas and can involve depreciative behaviours such as turning rocks over and removing organisms. The activities Erlotinib ic50 seen to be damaging to the environment and not that beneficial to the visitor (including GSK3 inhibitor fishing and bait collecting) are typically associated with the resource and less focussed on a recreational purpose. Consequently, these more resource focussed activities appear to be detrimental to the environment and

not that valuable to visitors’ wellbeing. This paper adopted a novel approach to explore these trade-offs; however, more research is necessary to investigate these complicated relationships and to conclude the optimum activities to encourage, while discouraging others. For example, health benefits may be higher for activities that involve more exploration of rocky shores (e.g. rock

pooling) compared to more passive activities such as sunbathing/relaxing. We focussed on psychological health effects (e.g. changes in mood, happiness) 2-hydroxyphytanoyl-CoA lyase rather than physiological health implications. Future research would be well placed to investigate such additional trade-offs. With our paper we hope to begin a discussion around more integrative approaches that appreciate the complexity of the overall impacts (on both visitors and the environment), with the end goal of informing management practices accordingly. It was noted that this research only assessed participants’ perceptions and not actual experiences. This perceptual approach is both a strength and a weakness. For visitor impacts, we could have recorded actual visitors’ experiences via self-report questionnaires and/or physiological measures. Similarly, for the environmental impacts, objective frequency data could have been collected and/or a more experimental approach could have been used, such as examining the effects visits have on rocky shores by manipulating intensity and types of activities and recording their impacts on different organisms. However, as there has been little research examining both components together, it would have been premature to do this.