2 The review included studies that looked at the influence

of both major and less than major depression. Several studies AZD0530 ic50 performed on large post-MI samples have now looked at the effect of increasing severity of depressive symptoms, and there is a consistent positive association between the severity of depressive symptoms and an increased risk of mortality.14,15 Even since the 2005 Evidence Reports/Technology Assessment13 review was published 2 years ago, additional evidence has continued to accumulate.16,17 In addition to the increased risk of acute coronary syndromes, depression has also been associated with increased mortality in congestive heart failure18 Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical and following Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical ischemic stroke (Figure 2). 19,20 Figure 2. Cumulative mortality in depressed and nondepressed patients following myocardial infarct

(MI). Adapted from ref 12: Frasure-Smith N, Lesperance F, Talajic M. Depression following myocardial infarction. Impact on 6-month survival. JAMA. 1993 20;270:1819-1825. Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical … Reducing mortality from cardiovascular disease by treating depression The obvious question raised by the strong association between depression and cardiac mortality is whether treatment of depression would reduce mortality. Enhancing Recovery in Coronary Heart Disease (ENRICHD)21 was a randomized, controlled trial sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI).This Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical trial tested whether cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) reduced mortality in patients after MI compared with usual care. CBT reduced depression modestly but did not alter mortality The original ENRICHD article21 reported briefly that 20% Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical of the 1853 depressed patients received antidepressant drugs, and that those individuals had a statistically

significant (42%) reduction in a combined end point of death or recurrent MI, but this observation came from data that was neither randomized nor controlled. Several years later, Taylor published a much more detailed analysis of antidepressant drug use in the ENRICHD trial.22 Among many other problems, the absence of randomization was not subtle; only those known to be at higher risk for cardiac events were offered antidepressants. In addition, there was no control over when the drug was started or stopped. Nevertheless, the sample was very large, the number out of events reasonable, and the magnitude of the effect is hard to ignore (hazard ratio, 0.57 [95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.84]). This is a post-hoc observation, not an a priori test of a hypothesis. However, it is a strong signal that antidepressant drugs can reduce life-threatening events. Another hint that antidepressants can reduce post-MI mortality came from the Sertraline Antidepressant Heart Attack Randomized Trial (SADHART).