1.0%, 69/119) presented a prolonged PFS (4.2 months vs. 1.2 months P < 0.001) and improved ORR [23.2% (16/69) vs. 3.2% (1/31) P = 0.010) as well as DCR [69.6% (48/69) vs. 35.5% (11/31),P = 0.001), compared with patients with

pTyr1068 negative patients (Figure 4, Table 2). Interestingly, median PFS in sixteen patients with both wild-type EGFR and pTyr1068 who have responded to EGFR-TKIs was 15.6 months (95%CI: 7.28-23.9). Figure 4 Progression-free PND-1186 in vitro survival curves in subgroup patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation positive (A) and negative (B) according to phosphorylated tyrosine (pTyr)1068 espression. pTyr1173 expression MK-8931 Of 165 patients assessable for pTyr1173, 95 patients (57.6%) had positive pTyr1173. No significant association was observed between pTyr1173 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics including sex, age, and histology, smoking status and disease stage. Interestingly, there seemed to be a contra-correlation between pTyr1173 expression and clinical outcomes. Although differences in ORR between two groups according to pTyr1173 expression were unremarkable [27.8% (25/90) for positive VS. 37.9% (25/66) for negative, P = 0.123]. DCR was 64.4% (58/90) for positive vs. 88.3%

Proteasome inhibitor (58/66) for negative (P = 0.007) (Table 1). And PFS was 4.8 months vs. 7.7 months, (P = 0.016) for negative and positive pTyr1173 which is statistically significant. Interactions of biomarkers and combinational analysis Relationship of these biomarkers and their clinical significance were analyzed. A trivial correlation between expression of pTyr1068 and EGFR mutations was observed (kappa = 0.191, p < 0.001). Correlations between expressions of pTyr1173, pTyr1068 and EGFR mutations (Table 3) were not significant. Analysis for combinational models of these three biomarkers suggested that in the subset of patients with an EGFR mutations, patients with both pTyr1068

positive and pTyr1173 negative expressions had superior response to TKIs as well as significantly longer PFS (P < 0.001), ORR (P < 0.001) and DCR (P < 0.001) (Table 4). However, no significant differences of response to gefitinib or erlotinib was observed between patients with phosphorylated Tyr1068 and Tyr1173 of EGFR (P > 0.05). Table 3 very Association between EGFR mutation and EGFR phosphorylations Variables (no.of patients, %) EGFR mutation pTyr1068 pTyr1173     + – p + – p + – p Total 92(44.9) 113(55.1)   164(80.0) 41(20.0)   95(57.6) 70(42.4)   EGFR mutation +       84(91.3) 8(8.7) <0.001 41(54.7) 34(45.3) 0.297   –       80(70.8) 33(29.2)   54(60.0) 36(40.0)   pTyr1068 + 84(51.2) 80(48.8) <0.001       82(61.2) 52(38.8) 0.069   – 8(19.5) 33(80.5)         13(41.9) 18(58.1)   pTyr1173 + 41(43.2) 54(56.8) 0.297 82(86.3) 13(13.7) 0.069         – 34(48.6) 36(51.4)   52(74.3) 18(25.7)         Abbreviations: EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; pTyr, phophorylated tyrosine.