While class I hydrophobin aggregates are extremely stable, and ca

While class I hydrophobin aggregates are extremely stable, and can be dissociated only in trifluoroacetic acid and formic acid, class II hydrophobin aggregates can be solubilised in Napabucasin cell line hot sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) or 60% ethanol [2]. Hydrophobins have been shown to serve TSA HDAC supplier several basic functions in fungi. By covering hyphal walls with a hydrophobic surface layer, they allow hyphae to escape from aqueous substrates and to develop aerial mycelia [1]. Similarly, conidia are often covered with rodlet layers, which facilitate their dispersal by air or water droplets. Loss of the hydrophobin layers by targeted

mutagenesis of hydrophobin genes can lead to drastic reduction in surface hydrophobicity, resulting in ‘easily wettable’ phenotypes [2]. In the rice pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae mutants in the class I hydrophobin Mpg1 produced easily wettable conidia and hyphae lacking rodlets, and were defective

in appressorium formation and host infection. This was attributed to the inability of the germ tubes to firmly attach to the hydrophobic plant cuticle and to appropriately sense surface features leading to appressorium differentiation [4, 5]. In the same fungus, the class II hydrophobin Mhp1 was also found to be involved in hyphal surface hydrophobicity and for pathogenesis [6]. The tree pathogen Ophiostoma ulmi produces cerato-ulmin, a class II hydrophobin which is a wilt-inducing toxin. Regarding its role in pathogenesis, a final conclusion has not yet been reached. While toxin-deficient mutants were not affected in pathogenicity, SPTLC1 their phenotypes PF-3084014 molecular weight indicated that it contributes to the fitness of the spores of O. ulmi [7, 8]. Similarly, hydrophobin mutations in the tomato pathogen Cladosporium fulvum did not impair the mutant strains to cause disease [9]. Botrytis cinerea (teleomorph Botryotinia fuckeliana) is a necrotrophic plant pathogenic ascomycete with a wide host range,

including economically important fruits, vegetables and ornamental flowers. After colonisation of the host tissue, the fungus forms aerial mycelia that produce large numbers of conidia, which are the main source of new infections. Due to their surface hydrophobicity, conidia adhere easily to the plant surface [10]. This initial adhesion is relatively weak and followed by stronger attachment immediately after emergence of the germ tube [11]. Germ tubes secrete an ensheathing film that appears to mediate adhesion to hydrophobic and hydrophilic substrates. The biochemical composition of the film has been analysed, and was found to consist mainly of carbohydrates and proteins, plus minor amounts of lipids [12]. Germination of B. cinerea conidia has been found to depend both on the availability of nutrients and on physical surface properties. In solutions containing sugars as sole organic nutrients, efficient germination occurs only on a hard surface. In the absence of nutrients, germination can still be induced on hard, hydrophobic surfaces [13].

Comments are closed.