To understand why cruising may also effect change in infants’ reaching patterns, we must consider the central role of the

upper extremities for manual control of balance and haptic exploration. Cruisers keep balance manually and prioritize manual information to such an extent that they often fail to pay attention to perceptual information from any Epigenetic Reader Domain inhibitor source other than their arms. As long as cruising infants have a continuous handrail to hold on to they will blithely cruise along into a 3-foot drop off in the floor—even when a researcher points it out to them (Adolph, Berger & Leo, 2011). Cruising infants use their hands to obtain haptic information about their surface of support (S. E. Berger, G. L. Y. Chan, & K. E. Adolph, unpublished data). They rub, tap, squeeze, etc., the support surface in the same way that infants explore toys and other novel objects (Klatzky, Lederman, & Mankinen, 2005; Lederman, Summers, & Klatzky, 1996; Lobo & Galloway, 2008). Although the arms and legs move independently in cruising (Vereijken & Adolph,

1999), the arms’ new role in exploration, balance control, and locomotion is complementary suggesting that the onset of cruising prompts an increase in bimanual reaching. It is not until the arms are rigidly coupled in the high guard position at the onset of walking that infants’ reaching preferences are overwhelmingly bimanual. At the systemic level, https://www.selleckchem.com/products/NVP-AUY922.html the interconnectedness of the neuromotor system means that changes in one area may prompt changes in another. For example, the onset of the transition from crawling to walking HA-1077 concentration is associated

with increased instability for lateralization preferences (Berger et al., 2011; Goldfield, 1993). Even more broadly, changes in motor skill have effects beyond the motor domain (Berger & Scher, 2011). For example, the onset of sitting precipitates a decrement in infants’ ability to process faces and the onset of walking elicits an increase in perseverative behaviors (Berger, 2010; Cashon, Ha, Allen, & Barna, 2013). Situated in this broader context, infants’ preference for unimanual reaching may decrease at the onset of cruising because infants may need to reallocate attentional resources as they focus on acquiring the new skills of cruising and walking (Berger, 2010). Infants return to less adaptive, but less demanding behaviors to compensate for the overload of processing complex, novel information (e.g., Cashon et al., 2013; Cohen & Cashon, 2006; Cohen, Chaput, & Cashon, 2002).