To our knowledge, there is just one study of the P700 reduction rate as function of the PMS concentration (Gourovskaya et al. 1997), while Byrdin et al. (2000) reported the reduction rate for the specific concentration used in their work. Further, IKK inhibitor we found one comment by Bulychev and Vredenberg (2001) that PMS at concentrations ≥5 μM is a light-dependent quencher for chlorophyll fluorescence of thylakoids. In this study, we investigated (i) the P700+ reduction rate in the presence of different PMS concentrations in
order to estimate (i) which fraction of RCs is closed at specific light intensities, (ii) the chlorophyll fluorescence quenching effect of PMS, and (iii) the difference in fluorescence quantum yield of PSI with open and closed RCs. RC: open or closed? Although in most of the spectroscopic PSI experiments reported in the literature, it is claimed that the RCs are open, quantitative
data are usually not presented. In a typical synchroscan streak-camera experiment on PSI the MLL inhibitor excitation light intensity is ~100 μW, the repetition rate is 150 kHz, the path lengths is 2 mm, and the spot diameter is 150 μm ( e.g., Ihalainen et al. 2005). Taking into account the photon energy of the excitation wavelength the number of photons per second and per pulse can be obtained. And {Selleck Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleck Anticancer Compound Library|Selleck Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleck Anticancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anticancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anti-cancer Compound Library|Selleckchem Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library|buy Anti-cancer Compound Library|Anti-cancer Compound Library ic50|Anti-cancer Compound Library price|Anti-cancer Compound Library cost|Anti-cancer Compound Library solubility dmso|Anti-cancer Compound Library purchase|Anti-cancer Compound Library manufacturer|Anti-cancer Compound Library research buy|Anti-cancer Compound Library order|Anti-cancer Compound Library mouse|Anti-cancer Compound Library chemical structure|Anti-cancer Compound Library mw|Anti-cancer Compound Library molecular weight|Anti-cancer Compound Library datasheet|Anti-cancer Compound Library supplier|Anti-cancer Compound Library in vitro|Anti-cancer Compound Library cell line|Anti-cancer Compound Library concentration|Anti-cancer Compound Library nmr|Anti-cancer Compound Library in vivo|Anti-cancer Compound Library clinical trial|Anti-cancer Compound Library cell assay|Anti-cancer Compound Library screening|Anti-cancer Compound Library high throughput|buy Anticancer Compound Library|Anticancer Compound Library ic50|Anticancer Compound Library price|Anticancer Compound Library cost|Anticancer Compound Library solubility dmso|Anticancer Compound Library purchase|Anticancer Compound Library manufacturer|Anticancer Compound Library research buy|Anticancer Compound Library order|Anticancer Compound Library chemical structure|Anticancer Compound Library datasheet|Anticancer Compound Library supplier|Anticancer Compound Library in vitro|Anticancer Compound Library cell line|Anticancer Compound Library concentration|Anticancer Compound Library clinical trial|Anticancer Compound Library cell assay|Anticancer Compound Library screening|Anticancer Compound Library high throughput|Anti-cancer Compound high throughput screening| based on the absorption of the sample, the estimated extinction coefficient and the excited volume, the number of photons absorbed per PSI per second and per pulse can be calculated. In the Result section, we have shown that this information can be employed to give a reliable estimation of the fraction of Racecadotril closed RCs. In the experiment of Ihalainen et al. (2005), the number of photons absorbed per PSI per pulse was ~0.3, thus 45000 photons/PSI/s. With a P700 reduction rate of 36/s (using 10 μM of PMS), 99.9% of the RCs would be closed. To lower the
excitation pressure, the sample was contained in a spinning cuvette with a diameter of 10 cm and rotated at a speed of 30 Hz. As there is space for ~2000 spots on the circle, the average number of absorbed photons/PSI/s/spot is lowered to 23. However, taking into account the reduction rate of 36/s, still ~40% of the RCs are expected to be closed. This number is probably even higher because the sample is hit by 2.4 pulses while passing through the excitation spot, meaning that there is a large probability to hit one PSI twice during the short passes time. One solution to lower the fraction of closed RCs, under very similar experimental conditions, is to increase the PMS concentration, ( see e.g., Giera et al. 2010). However, this will also increase the PMS chlorophyll fluorescence quenching (Fig. 4). A more elegant way to keep the RCs open is given by Müller et al. (2003). They use a spinning cuvette, which also moves sideways, in this system the excitation cycle time of the same volume is ~1 min (Müller et al. 2003).