This is important in closure studies using radiative transfer to solve algorithms for relating IOPs to reflectance, especially when using the same FF family of functions, which may cause about 4% RSR variability depending on the parameterization used (at present there is more than one available, namely Mobley

et al. (2002) and Freda & Piskozub (2007), and none of them seem to be the last word in this field). However, the same variability is important more generally in radiative transfer calculations that still use several different families of analytical function as well as the ‘classical’ Petzold functions. We also show a previously unknown effect of high (up FG-4592 mouse to 10%) discrepancy in RSR values calculated using the same functions in the high ω0 value range (highly scattering waters). This may impact on radiative transfer calculations of waters with bubble clouds. Finally, we discuss the reasons for the peak in the studied discrepancy for solar zenith angles close to 0°. We argue that this peak is caused by differences in the backscattering peak between the phase functions of identical bb/b as a direct result of the effect of solar zenith angles and backscattering angles on selleck screening library vertical

water-leaving radiance values. Włodzimierz Freda acknowledges support from Ministry of Science grant No. N306 470038 and internal funds of Gdynia Maritime University, while Jacek Piskozub acknowledges support from IO PAS, Sopot, statutory research project I.3. We are especially grateful to David McKee of Strathclyde University for his valuable comments. “
“It is usual to use the characteristic periods and heights of incoming irregular waves for calculating run up, overtopping, morphological changes and reflection from perforated seawalls. If a coastal structure is defended by a smooth submerged breakwater, it is important to calculate the modified wave parameters behind it. When waves cross a breakwater, wave breaking and nonlinear Cediranib (AZD2171) interactions occur between the components of wave spectra. These interactions cause

a transition of wave energy from primary harmonics to higher harmonics of the wave spectra. The amount of energy transferred depends on the incoming wave parameters, breakwater geometry and water depth. Beji & Battjes (1993) observed high frequency wave energy amplifications as waves propagate over a submerged bar in a laboratory experiment. They found that the bound harmonics were amplified during shoaling and released in the deeper water region after the bar crest. Wave breaking itself is a secondary effect in this process, dissipating the overall wave energy without significantly changing its relative spectral distribution. Generally speaking, knowledge of the impact of breakwater geometry and incoming wave parameters on wave spectrum deformation is insufficient. The transfer of energy to higher harmonics of the wave spectra leads to a transformation in statistical and spectral wave periods.