The guidelines will be reviewed and updated as required

on a 6-monthly basis with a plan for an extensive rewrite in 2016. The Writing Group will continue to meet regularly to consider new information from high-quality studies and publish amendments and addendums to the current recommendations prior to the full revision date where this is clinically important data developed to ensure continued best clinical practice. The BHIVA Writing Group recognises that cost-effectiveness data are important in the formulation of guidelines and it was agreed as a critical outcome for certain priority questions (Table 1.1). There are limited cost-effectiveness data in the UK comparing different antiretroviral drugs in HIV mono-infection and none examining different antiretroviral drugs or anti-HBV or anti-HCV therapies in adults with Cyclopamine cell line HBV/HIV or HCV/HIV infection or different Doramapimod datasheet screening strategies for hepatitis viruses in HIV infection. Hence, the intervention was deemed cost-effective if it was both less costly in terms of likely resource use and more clinically effective compared with other relevant alternative strategies within the data available to the expert(s) writing the specific guideline. However, the Writing Group believes that reducing management costs should not be at the cost of increased risk of poorer

outcomes and quality of care. 1  BHIVA Guideline Development Manual, September 2011. Available at: www.bhiva.org/GuidelineDevelopmentManual.aspx (accessed 3 May 2013). 2  Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. Going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 2008; 336: 1049–1051. 3  The Grading of VAV2 Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (short GRADE) Working Group. Available at: www.gradeworkinggroup.org (accessed 3 May 2013). 4  Brook G, Main J, Nelson M et al. for the BHIVA Viral Hepatitis Working Group. British HIV Association guidelines for the management of coinfection with HIV-1 and hepatitis B or C virus 2010. HIV Med 2010; 11: 1–30. 3 Patient involvement in care 3.2 Good practice points   1. We recommend all adults with viral hepatitis and HIV infection are given the opportunity to be actively involved in making decisions about their

treatment.   2. We recommend all adults with viral hepatitis and HIV infection should have access to psychosocial support at all times.   3. We recommend provision of treatment-support resources should include in-house, independent and community information providers and peer-support resources.   4. We recommend that all adults with viral hepatitis and HIV infection are offered a copy of the clinic letters and are encouraged to discuss their diagnosis and care with their primary care physician. 3.3 Auditable outcome Proportion of adults with viral hepatitis and HIV infection with documentation in the case records who have been given the opportunity to be involved in making decisions about their treatment 4 Screening, prevention and immunisation 4.