Surprisingly, injection of IFNb plasmid gave a low level of protection against ISAV infection despite the fact that IFNb and IFNc plasmids induced comparable amounts of Mx and ISG15 protein in liver 8 weeks after injection. This may be due to that IFNb and IFNc use different receptors and consequently induce antiviral proteins in different cell types. This idea was examined by immunohistochemistry
of Mx protein in heart and liver, which are strongly affected by ISAV infection. Selleck PS341 Focal necrosis in liver of ISAV infected fish is commonly found, but the main target cells for infection by ISAV are endothelial cells lining the circulatory system and not hepatocytes . Sections of liver from IFNb and IFNc treated fish showed similar Mx-staining except that endothelial cells appeared to be more strongly stained in IFNc treated fish compared to IFNb treated fish. This may thus in part explain the differences in protection obtained with IFNc compared to IFNb plasmid. Moreover, heart tissue showed stronger Mx staining throughout in fish treated with IFNc plasmid compared to IFNb plasmid, which was confirmed by immunoblotting of Mx. This suggests that IFNc induces antiviral proteins more strongly than IFNb in several different learn more cell types in heart. Other explanations
may, however, also be possible since mammalian type I IFNs are known to have a wide range of biological activities such as sensitizing cells to apoptosis upon subsequent viral infection , stimulation of cytotoxic activity of NK cells  and stimulation of cells involved in adaptive immune responses .
The difference in effect of IFNb and IFNc may be due to differences in use of receptors, which is currently under investigation by our group. Whether i.m. injection of IFNc plasmid might be a usable method for combating virus infections in farmed salmon depends on several questions, which have to be answered in future studies. Among those are the duration of the Metalloexopeptidase antiviral effects of IFNc plasmid injection, whether IFNc plasmid protects against other viruses and eventual side effects. For example, it needs to be examined if IFNc plasmid injection affects the general performance of the fish such as growth and smoltification. In such studies the level of IFNc expression may be controlled by the plasmid dose and/or by using promoters other than the CMV promoter. The benefit of using IFNc plasmid in prophylaxis against virus infections is that it induces antiviral genes with a broad spectrum of antiviral properties while conventional DNA vaccines are designed to induce adaptive immune responses that are directed toward specific pathogens.