“Objective: Use of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is a


“Objective: Use of single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is associated with reduced antibiotic resistance, lower costs, and fewer problems with drug toxicity and superinfections. We tested the hypothesis that single doses of cefazolin are as effective as a 24-hour regimen of cefazolin in preventing surgical site infections in adults undergoing cardiac procedures.

Methods: This random, prospective, clinical study included 838 adult patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting, valve operations, or both. These patients

were randomly given a single dose of cefazolin (2 g) or a 24-hour treatment (2-g initial dose, followed by 1 g every 8 hours). Investigators blinded to selleck products the drug regimen diagnosed wound infections according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Patient clinical and demographic characteristics were noted, with follow-up for 12 postoperative months. The primary objective was to compare the incidence of surgical infections between groups up to 12 months postoperatively.

Results: A total of 419 patients received single-dose cefazolin, and

another 419 received the selleck chemical 24-hour treatment. Surgical site infection occurred in 35 (8.3%) patients receiving single doses and 15 (3.6%) patients administered the 24-hour treatment (P = .004). We identified no differences between groups for mortality or duration of hospitalization (preoperative hospitalization, intensive care unit stay, and hospitalization after surgical intervention). The microorganisms isolated showed a similar distribution in both groups. The

germs isolated were gram-positive cocci in 86% of the surgical site infections.

Conclusions: Single-dose cefazolin used as antibiotic prophylaxis ISRIB purchase in cardiac surgery is associated with a higher surgical site infection rate than the 24-hour, multiple-dose cefazolin regimen.”
“Alterations in the levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in the brain can allosterically modulate gamma-aminobutyric-acid-type-A (GABA(A)R), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDAR), and Sigma-1 (sigma 1R) receptors. In humans, DHEA has antidepressive effects; however, the mechanism is unknown. We examined whether alterations in DHEA also occur in an animal model of depression, the Flinders-sensitive-line (FSL) rats, with the intention of determining the brain site of DHEA action and its antidepressant mechanism. We discovered that DHEA levels were lower in some brain regions involved with depression of FSL rats compared to Sprague-Dawley (SD) controls. Moreover, DHEA (1 mg/kg IP for 14 days)-treated FSL rats were more mobile in the forced swim test than FSL controls. In the NAc and VTA, significant changes were observed in the levels of the delta-subunit of GABA(A), but not of sigma 1R mRNA, in FSL rats compared to SD rats. The delta-subunit controls the sensitivity of the GABA(A)R to the neurosteroid.

Comments are closed.