A

summary of recommendations including grade of recommendation is presented in colour-coded organisation Selleckchem Venetoclax on pages 4–29. These cover evidence for organisation of services, stroke recognition and pre-hospital care, early assessment and diagnosis, acute medical and surgical management, secondary prevention, rehabilitation, managing complications, community participation and long term recovery, and cost and socioeconomic implications. This is followed by detailed chapters that discuss the specific evidence that underpins each recommendation. Many sections are relevant to physiotherapy, such as the organisation of services, the amount, timing, and intensity of rehabilitation, management of sensorimotor impairment, rehabilitation of physical activity, managing complications such as contracture, pain, cardiorespiratory fitness, Selleck SCR7 and falls, and long term recovery. All references (990) are provided at the end of the document. Appendices include information on the National Stroke Audit,

and priorities for research. This is a comprehensive, multidisciplinary document that provides detailed, latest evidence for the management of individuals presenting with stroke or TIA. “
“The evidence-based practice (EBP) movement has gained ground steadily in physiotherapy over the past decade. Influential researchers and clinicians have argued that physiotherapists have a moral and professional obligation to move away from assessment and treatment methods based on anecdotal testimonies or opinion (Grimmer-Somers

2007). However, the growing volume below of high-quality clinical research makes it difficult for clinicians to keep pace with the latest evidence. Simultaneously, the practice of physiotherapy has become increasingly complex due to changes in health care systems that entail higher demands on physiotherapists to provide effective and efficient management of patients amidst high patient turnover. Research on implementation of EBP in physiotherapy has established many barriers to developing a more evidence-based physiotherapy practice. Most frequently identified barriers include factors such as time restrictions, limited access to research, poor confidence in skills to identify and critically appraise research, and inadequate support from colleagues, managers and other health professionals (Jette et al 2003, Iles & Davidson 2006, Grimmer-Somers et al 2007). Limited research in some areas of physiotherapy also constitutes an obstacle to practising evidence-based physiotherapy (Fruth et al 2010). Some authors express the influences on EBP in physiotherapy as facilitators rather than barriers.