41, p = 0.004, ç2 = 0.173), and successful catch (F(4, 49) = 14.38, p < 0.001, ç2 = 0.242). Pairwise comparisons

showed that the training groups had significantly larger positive changes in scores (all p < 0.05). A significant main effect of Group was found on the change in catch scores (F(4, 49) = 8.69, p = 0.005, η2 = 0.162) and pairwise comparison showed that the improvement among the group with CP was significantly higher than that in the group without disability (p = 0.005). Age was a significant covariate only for jumping distance (F(4, 49) = 4.63, p = 0.037, ç2 = 0.093). No interactions were found in any of the movement outcome scores. Table 1 summarizes the baseline and post-test scores in aggregate movement pattern and individual movement outcome assessments. Paired samples t tests showed statistically significant differences in the participants' selleck chemical weekday and weekend baseline PA (all p < 0.05). In

both groups of children (with BMN 673 supplier CP and without disability), the percentage of sedentary time was found to be higher during weekends, while percentages of LPA and MVPA time were lower. As such, comparisons of baseline and post-training PA were analyzed separately for weekend and weekday data. No main effect of Training was found in any of the three PA categories of sedentary, LPA, and MVPA. This overall lack of change in weekday PA as a consequence of FMS training is apparent in Fig. 1. A significant second main effect of Group was found on the change in percentage of monitored MVPA time (F(4, 49) = 6.52, p = 0.014, ç2 = 0.126). Pairwise comparison showed that children with CP in general, showed an increase of MVPA percentage at post-test, while children without disability showed a decrease (p = 0.014). There was no interaction between Group and Training. Age

was found to have a significant main effect on the change in sedentary time (F(4, 49) = 6.11, p = 0.017, ç2 = 0.119) and MVPA time (F(4, 49) = 4.64, p = 0.037, ç2 = 0.093), but not in LPA time. For weekend PA, significant main effects of Training (F(4,49) = 29.47, p < 0.001, ç2 = 0.396) and Group (F(4, 49) = 5.98, p = 0.019, ç2 = 0.117) were found on change in the percentage of sedentary time and pairwise comparisons showed that the training groups displayed a significant decrease in sedentary time (p < 0.001) but not the control groups. Training groups of children with CP and children without disability both manifested decreased sedentary time, but the drop for the group with CP was bigger (p = 0.019). Age was a significant covariate (F(4, 49) = 4.36, p = 0.043, ç2 = 0.088), but no significant interactions were found. A significant main effect of Training was found for the percentage of time spent in LPA (F(4, 49) = 8.03, p = 0.007, ç2 = 0.151), and a pairwise comparison showed that training groups had an increase in LPA while control groups had a decrease (p = 0.007). No significant effects of Group or Age, and no significant interactions were found.