To investigate the role

of fim2 in virulence, isogenic fi

To investigate the role

of fim2 in virulence, isogenic fim2 mutants were constructed and examined in three murine models, each focussed VE-821 nmr on primary infection of a distinct clinically-relevant anatomical site. Surprisingly, despite many fimbrial systems having been clearly implicated in virulence, we detected no clear evidence of attenuation (murine lung and urinary tract infection models) or reduction in colonizing ability (murine intestinal colonization model) in the fim2-negative strains studied. Intriguingly, examination of bladder CFU count-based CIs for the urinary tract infection experiments hinted at a subtle role for fim2 in the colonization of bladder and kidney tissues. In both tissues, Ulixertinib research buy median wildtype CFU counts were approximately ten-fold higher than those of the fim2 mutant, although when performed in a fim negative background this difference was reversed and reduced in bladder and kidney samples, respectively. Nevertheless, the latter conflicting results may due to the markedly lower CFU counts

obtained in the fim negative background. As shown by neutral CI values in the lung tissue but an approximately 100-fold higher median liver CFU count for KR2107 as compared to its isogenic fim2 mutant, the fim2 locus would appear to be involved in systemic dissemination www.selleckchem.com/products/ch5183284-debio-1347.html and/or survival of K. pneumoniae following primary infection of the respiratory tract. However, given the noted lack of statistical significance, low numbers of mice examined and substantial mouse-to-mouse variation for these liver CFU data, no firm conclusions can be derived at present. As an aside, the previously demonstrated Morin Hydrate dramatic positive contribution of fim to urovirulence in this murine model was also shown to be the case in the KR2107 background [22, 23]. At an overview level, based on total CFU counts per liver and per kidney for the lung infection and ascending urinary tract infection models, respectively, there was

a suggestion, though not supported statistically, of an ordered gradation amongst the four isogenic strains with the most-to-least virulent as follows: KR2107, KR2107∆fim2, KR2107∆fim and KR2107∆fim∆fim2. We speculate this relates to a Fim2-mediated enhancement of bacterial biofilm-forming-, adhesive- and/or invasive-potential under the in vivo conditions tested. In addition, the predicted influence of Fim2K on the c-di-GMP regulatory circuit, may itself impact on virulence via regulation of Fim2, Fim and/or other virulence factors. The fim2 cluster was also assessed for its ability to contribute to biofilm formation. Gene knock-out experiments in KR2107 failed to reveal a role for fim2 in biofilm formation. However, the function of the product of fim2 may have been masked due to physical interference by the K. pneumoniae capsule, a phenomenon previously observed with type 1 fimbriae [38, 39]. Alternatively, it may be a function of limited fim2 expression under the in vitro conditions examined.

Comments are closed.