Indeed, currently squamous cell carcinoma appears neglected as far as targeted molecular therapies are considered, being most of these selective molecules employed essentially for the adenocarcinoma subtype. If the role of SGK1 as a

specific molecular marker for squamous cell carcinoma will be further validated, an inhibitor of SGK1 kinase activity would be highly appreciated in this NSCLC specific phenotype. Indeed, inhibitors of the AKT family of serine/threonine kinases, structurally and functionally closely selleck chemicals llc related to the SGK factors, have been already described, and their use in clinical trials is underway [30–32]. It seems clear, however, that our knowledge on the role of the SGK family factors in neoplastic JQEZ5 purchase diseases is at a very early stage and that further studies are therefore necessary to indicate the most appropriate use of the determination of these kinases in prognostic/predictive evaluation of NSCLC patients

as well as the possibility to consider them as a druggable target for specific small molecule inhibitors. Conclusions This work is an explorative study on the role of SGK1, the most represented member of the SGK family of serine/threonine kinases, in NSCLC. The Selleckchem GDC 973 notions derived from our cohort of patients confirm the “”oncogenic”" role of SGK1, where higher mRNA expression appears related to patients with worse prognostic indicators. Moreover, the significantly higher SGK1 expression in the squamous cell subtype of NSCLC could indicate this factor as central in establishing prognostic/predictive parameters as well as in enforcing the design of SGK serine/threonine kinase inhibitors to be employed in the management of patients with squamous cell lung cancer. Acknowledgements The authors thank Dr. Irene Terrenato for her Nabilone help in statistical analysis. This work was supported by grants from Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC), Ministero della Salute and Human Health Foundation (HHF) to M.G.P. References 1. Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM: Lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2008, 359:1367–1380.PubMedCrossRef 2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics,

2009. CA Cancer J Clin 2009, 59:225–249.PubMedCrossRef 3. Boffetta P: Epidemiology of environmental and occupational cancer. Oncogene 2004, 23:6392–6403.PubMedCrossRef 4. Patel JD: Lung cancer in women. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:3212–3218.PubMedCrossRef 5. Subramanian J, Govindan R: Lung cancer in never smokers: a review. J Clin Oncol 2007, 25:561–570.PubMedCrossRef 6. Samet JM, Avila-Tang E, Boffetta P, Hannan LM, Olivo-Marston S, Thun MJ, et al.: Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors. Clin Cancer Res 2009, 15:5626–5645.PubMedCrossRef 7. Paggi MG, Vona R, Abbruzzese C, Malorni W: Gender-related disparities in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Lett 2010, 298:1–8.PubMedCrossRef 8.