The National Community Pharmacists Association asserts that independent pharmacies encourage the training of pharmacy technicians, but believes that required standards need to be differentiated based on work area. It also desires to know the financial impact of such requirements and how the standards would be implemented for special situations (e.g. technicians employed buy Sirolimus part-time). If other organizations are unanimous in the move towards standardization and accreditation, the National Community Pharmacists Association states that it will fully support

and follow the decision accordingly.[20] Although chain pharmacies encourage the continuing education of their pharmacy technicians, the idea of setting mandatory standards has raised some concerns. Chain pharmacies suggest that their sector of the profession will be most affected by changes in requirements for training due to the substantial portion of pharmacy technicians working in this sector. There are concerns that current economic factors, combined with a training mandate, could add to their overhead costs, both through possible payment of registration or certification fees, and through Torin 1 molecular weight likely wage increases sought by technicians.[20] In addition, chains have questioned whether part-time technicians and/or technicians employed in

rural areas will have adequate access to training or certification programmes, and whether the added time and expense would have a negative impact on those part-time technicians. The National

Association of Chain Drug Stores has also stated that the education and training required of pharmacy technicians is not identical across all pharmacy settings. Therefore, the overall sentiment is that state boards of pharmacy should ultimately mandate any changes.[20] The ASHP strongly supports standards and accreditation of pharmacy technicians, and this is especially true today when there is more pressure to delegate tasks to technicians so that Cytidine deaminase pharmacists can spend more time with patients. The organization posits that the immense variability in the knowledge, skills and abilities of technicians impacts the pharmacist’s comfort level with delegating non-professional responsibilities. The ASHP contends that ‘The state-by-state haphazard approach to the education and training of technicians is impossible to justify to the public. The current situation puts pharmacy at serious risk for erosion of public confidence as consumers and health officials become more aware of gaps in the qualifications within the pharmacy technician workforce.’[20] Studies performed in hospitals have demonstrated that, with appropriate training and supervision, pharmacy technicians can have a positive impact on pharmacy workload, reducing medication errors and allowing the pharmacist more time to focus on clinical aspects of the job.