Participation rates were 58% among those with adequate health literacy and 48% among those with limited health literacy (Table 2). In the unadjusted model, having adequate Selleck MK 1775 health literacy was associated with 50% greater odds of participating in CRC screening (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.27–1.78). Other positive predictors of CRC screening participation in unadjusted models were female sex, having up to degree or degree level educational qualifications,

being of managerial occupational class, being in any wealth quintile above the poorest, not having a limiting long-standing illness, limited activities of daily living, or depressive symptoms, and having excellent, very good, or good self-rated health. Older age was associated with being less likely to screen. When adjusted for age, sex, educational attainment, and net non-pension wealth, the association between adequate health literacy and CRC screening was partly attenuated to borderline statistical

significance (OR = 1.20; 1.00–1.44; Table 3). Occupational class and health-related covariates were not included in the model as they did not exert influence on the estimate for health literacy (Rothman and Greenland, 1998). In the multivariable model, female sex (OR = 1.31; 95% CI: 1.11–1.54) and being in any wealth quintile higher than the poorest (OR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.43–2.49 for the richest quintile) were BMS-354825 price positively associated with CRC screening while age was negatively associated (OR = 0.92; 95% CI: 0.91–0.94 per year increase). Results were unaltered in sensitivity analyses removing those who refused to complete the health literacy assessment and those who reported FOBT-based CRC screening outside of England’s national programme (not shown). Nearly one in three screening-aged adults lacked adequate health literacy skills in this large sample of older English adults. Limited health literacy was a barrier to participation in FOBT-based CRC screening available through England’s National Bowel Cancer Screening from Programme. Adults who responded correctly to all items on a four-item comprehension measure of a basic medicine label

had 20% greater odds of participating in screening than those who responded incorrectly to at least one item. Younger adults within the screening-eligible age range, women, and those in richer wealth quintiles were also more likely to screen; these factors were stronger predictors of screening than health literacy. However, literacy barriers to screening are modifiable while these demographic factors are either not or not easily modified; hence literacy represents a more feasible intervention target. Given that the NHS primarily communicates CRC screening information through posted written information, interventions that are appropriate for the health literacy skills of screening-aged adults are needed to reduce literacy-based inequalities in CRC screening and to improve overall uptake.